A university student sparked online debate after claiming that his project supervisor asked him to rewrite the opening three chapters of his research by hand, suspecting the typed version had been produced with artificial intelligence.
He shared the incident in a widely circulated post, accompanied by a photograph of several handwritten pages laid out on a table.
The supervisor’s concern stemmed from a belief that the original document had been copied from an AI tool, leading to the unusual request.
Supervisor’s Handwritten Directive
Voicing his frustration, the student quoted the supervisor’s instruction: “My Project supervisor say make I use pen and Paper write chapter 1-3, Say I Dey copy and paste from Ai.”
The attached image displayed neatly written chapters, indicating the student followed the directive.
Online Reaction and Debate
The post quickly gained traction as discussions about AI usage in academic work intensified.
Some social media users expressed sympathy, noting that handwritten submissions could serve as proof of original effort.
Others contended that educators are growing wary of AI‑generated material, while a third group emphasized that students must comprehend and defend their work, irrespective of any AI assistance.
The episode has further fueled conversations about the place of artificial intelligence in higher education and how institutions are responding to its expanding presence.
See the screenshot below for the handwritten chapters.
About the Author
